A prominent company known for its focus on privacy and security is taking a strong stand against Apple’s stringent policies governing its mobile ecosystem. The company is vocal in its criticism of the controls Apple imposes on developers and users through the App Store.
The core of their argument centers on the lack of competition and the perceived unfair practices within the App Store. Specifically, they highlight the high fees – often up to 30% – that Apple demands on transactions and subscriptions, which they argue are excessive and hinder innovation for smaller developers.
Adding to this, they point out the significant restriction on installing apps from outside the official store, a practice commonly referred to as sideloading. This limitation is seen as giving Apple too much control over app distribution and preventing alternative business models or direct engagement between developers and users.
Aligning themselves with a broader movement, this company has joined the intensifying antitrust push against Apple. This collective effort by developers and technology firms aims to compel Apple to open its platform. The objective is to allow for alternative app marketplaces, enable sideloading, and permit the use of competing payment systems, thereby fostering a more open and competitive environment.
This challenge underscores the growing global regulatory and industry pressure on dominant technology platforms to relax their control and allow for greater competition and choice for both developers and consumers. The call for an open ecosystem continues to gain momentum as stakeholders advocate for fairer terms and increased innovation possibilities.
Source: https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2025/07/01/proton_lawsuit_apple/
